Vaccination Does Not Prevent Infection

Vaccination Does Not Prevent Infection


Data from Israel's 4th wave of infection rates compared against their vaccination programme reveals that vaccination does NOT prevent infection:

Israel’s ‘fourth wave’ data: Vaccination does not prevent infection, America's Frontline Doctors, 12th of September 2021.

The article states:

"New data from Israel confirms that four months after mass vaccination the vaccinated public becomes infected with COVID at about the same rate as the unvaccinated. ..."

So - the vaccine passports and mandatory requirement in order to work is all complete nonsense.

The Figure on the left shows the number of cases in Israel since February 2020. There were more new cases in September 2021 than at the previous peaks. But how can that be after all of the social distancing, face nappies, lockdowns, restrictions, vaccination, ...

When are people going to learn that there is no beating viruses but instead learning to live with them as they are an integral part of life and our own makeup.


As Dr Dhand discusses in the following AdTube video, Singapore is one of the most vaccinated countries in the world and yet has seen large increases in the number of COVID-19 cases:

Highly vaccinated SINGAPORE suffers COVID surge…what does this mean scientifically?, AdTube video, 30th of September 2021.

Number of new cases of COVID-19 in Singapore as of the 30th of September 2021

The percentage of Singapore's population that were vaccinated against COVID-19 as of the 30th of September.

But how can there be more cases of COVID-19 in September 2021 than when the outbreak first occurred in March 2020? Isn't vaccination supposed to prevent the spread of the infection and by doing so reduce the number of cases?

Finally, the chickens are coming home to roost and we are seeing through this bullshit.

Defending the Indefensible

One of the fascinating aspects of the COVID-19 outbreak was how time and time again political "leaders" and government officials repeatedly attempted to defend the indefensible. A nice example was in September 2021 in relation to the vaccinating of 12-15 year old children in the UK:

COVID-19: 'Virtually any child' would get coronavirus between 12 and 15 without vaccination - Whitty, Sky News, 22nd of September 2021.

The government advisor Chris Whitty actually stated:

"Approximately half of all children have already had coronavirus during the pandemic ... The great majority of children who have not currently had COVID are going to get it at some point. ..."

He's so thick he doesn't realise what he said. If by September 2021 half of all children had had COVID-19 and effectively none died, then what is the point of being vaccinated? And yes, since ~50% have come into contact with the virus and it just washed over them, then given sufficient time it follows that the other 50% will contract the virus, and once again wash over them. So, why do all children need to be vaccinated? And if you are going to vaccinate children why not focus on the 50% that haven't had it?

Really - these people are either simpletons or hood-winkers. And my guess is a bit of both.